For years Globalists have been trying to use the weather to further their population replacement scheme. But, as the United States and European countries grow tired of welcoming illegal migrants who are often dangerous people with values and ambitions that oppose Western values and laws, Globalists are trying to rebrand them as “Climate Migrants” to gain them entry.
World Economic Forum (WEF)-tied journalist Gaia Vince, who brands herself as an environmental journalist, appeared on Sky News to convince audiences that millions of people must flee “climate change,” rising seas, mega-hurricanes, and so on.
Mass migration is not a negative consequence of the so-called “climate crisis” but a solution that needs to be seized and planned for, argues Vince, author of the recent book “Nomad Century: How to Survive the Climate Upheaval.” Large-scale people movements have the potential to address many societal problems, she falsely claims, and pave the way towards a fairer, safer, and more prosperous world.
World Economic Forum Climate Migration Scheme
At the beginning of 2022, The WEF warned that there would be 200 million “climate refugees” that needed to be brought into the west by 2050. They warned that it would be a “risk to global stability” if Americans and Europeans blocked their “organized transfer” of millions of illegals.
Last year, the World Bank estimated that “climate change” could prompt 216 million people to move within their countries by mid-century, including 86 million in sub-Saharan Africa alone.
The WEF released a “Global Risks Report 2022”, that demanded westerners open up their “homes, communities, and jobs” to climate illegals. Meanwhile, they failed to mention that these illegal economic migrants cut citizens’ career opportunities and wages while raising housing costs, states Breitbart.
The report admits the public opposition:
Disillusionment with globalization has fuelled nativist discourses and national interest policies in many destination countries in recent years, … Many governments, reflecting popular attitudes, have expressed concern about pressures on education and healthcare services, housing capacity and local employment; for others, integration concerns have been a priority.
For example, Chile and Peru have reframed their migration governance mechanisms, which complicates access for migrant and refugee populations [mostly from Haiti] to essential financial and healthcare services. Meanwhile, restrictive policies originally grounded in public health concerns have not been rolled back, as indicated by sustained declines in issued visas for the United Kingdom and the perpetuation of Title 42 expulsions at the US border.
But migration is great for migrants, poor countries, cheap-labor employers, and investors, says the report, supported by two major investment firms, SK Group in Korea and Zurich Insurance Group in Switzerland. It continues:
Economic migration often has considerable benefits for both origin and destination countries. It is “the most effective way to reduce poverty and share prosperity”, according to a World Bank report …
Businesses in destination countries are at risk from a global worker deficit and demand-side shocks [loss of consumer sales] that could result from constrained migration. Migrant workers comprise an attractive consumer group that can contribute to developing domestic markets
The WEF report and their “journalists” like Gaia Vince are part of a larger political campaign to build government and business support for flooding the United States and Europe with so-called “climate migrants.”
“Many U.S. advocacy groups are already pushing for population transfers — often under the guise of “climate refugees” — which could significantly increase revenues and profits for U.S. retailers and real estate investors,” reports Breitbart.
But the report admits climate migrants are just economic migrants: “Climate change is a key driver of migration. It displaces people directly because of natural disasters and can displace them indirectly by encouraging economic migration.”
Naturally, the globalist groups and their university-trained experts who wrote the report say that globalist groups and university-trained experts must manage the unwanted supply of migrant labor and consumers:
Better international collaboration is required to manage these flows to ensure that economic migrants are not exposed to exploitation and that involuntary migrants—refugees—crossing into other countries receive the assistance and shelter that they need.
The report also threatens governments, saying that governments that fail to manage the flow of migrants may cause political instability;
Destination-country governments also face risks domestically from failing to address citizens’ concerns with migration. Adopting stricter migration measures could encounter some popular backlash as pro-migration advocates make their voices heard on the streets and online, while failing to effectively manage inflows risks stoking the growth of populism.
The report does not mention that pro-globalist groups fund most of the pro-migration advocacy groups in the United States and Europe.
Admittedly, lots of migrants are going to be killed by government-encouraged migration, the report notes:
These perilous journeys can also lead to tragic loss of life, such as when people become lost at sea or face harsh weather while stuck in borderlands. At the time of writing, nearly 4,800 migrants were estimated to have perished or gone missing in 2021, most of them trying to reach Europe from Africa.
Continue reading at Breitbart
At this point, it becomes increasingly difficult to deny that the purpose of mass migration is to destroy local and national cultures through dilution. Open-border left-wing leaders are obliterating European and North American legal systems, cultural norms, and equal rights. Migrants are used not only by the left to dilute host cultures but to ensure more votes and to seize greater power.