For the first time in Italy, a court in Pesaro ruled that the contents of mRNA vaccines must be investigated. The decision comes after a 50-year-old man who has already contracted Covid and does not want to undergo the vaccine to work. However, despite already having Covid, the man was suspended due to his ‘non-compliance’ after refusing to take the jab.
The Pesaro court accepted the request of the man’s lawyer, Nicoletta Morante, who had asked the judge for a lab analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s Covid “vaccine” contents and its effects on a patient who has recovered from the infection and whether it is harmful in general to people’s health. Furthermore, the lawyer is questioning how the state can apply “informed consent to a case of mandatory vaccination”:
The first query is whether mandatory vaccination suits patients who have recovered from Covid. So firstly, we need to ask expert witnesses whether vaccinating the recovered is an appropriate medical practice.
The second query is based on my client’s research on non-human usage excipients contained in the vaccine. Moreover, based on a dossier that we had already prepared and of Dr. Ansovini’s technical consultancy, we have asked to ascertain how mRNA vaccines work since we are dealing exclusively with mRNA vaccines here and investigating whether mRNA vaccines or enzymes contained in mRNA vaccines, can be harmful to our health. Hence the request for technical assessment.
Let’s remind ourselves that there is also the peculiar issue concerning informed consent among the submitted queries. The informed consent form which the ASL [Regional Healthcare Service] of Marche asks people to sign, even in the cases of mandatory vaccination. Informed consent is something that usually applies to contracts. Because it usually sets out the contract terms.
So, applying informed consent to a case of mandatory vaccination is quite a contradiction. That is why we have submitted a request for court-appointed technical consultancy. And since it deals with a juridical matter, we will ask the judge to ascertain that too.
We want the court to examine the informed consent form in detail, which needs to be signed even in cases of mandatory vaccination.
The man at the heart of the civil case has already been cured of covid, yet his “freedom of movement was restricted at his job in an education facility in Italy because he did not want to get vaccinated. Moreover, since he falls within the age parameter and profession for which the vaccine was mandatory, he was also met by the “administrative sanction for violation of the vaccination obligation.”
In addition to “asking to establish whether vaccinating people who had recovered from Covid satisfies the proper administration of medicine,” the education professional wants to know “what proteins are present in the vaccines and whether they contain excipients for non-human use or are dangerous to people’s health,” a summary of the complaint read.
As part of the civil suit filed in Pesaro, Morante submitted medical professional’s research to support the man’s case. She included a medical researcher and virologist, Dr. Raffaele Ansovini, who believed that “mRNA vaccines do not fulfill the protective function for which they are injected.” The Doctor wrote that the mRNA vaccines “do not have the declared functional conformation,” and the immune response they generate “is ineffective.”
An analysis of enzymes in mRNA vaccines had already been done unofficially by Ansovini, who found the presence of about 25 substances not declared by pharmaceutical companies.
“Thanks to the advice of Dr. Raffaele Ansovini, the plaintiff already having healed from a Covid infection, unjustly [so we argue] limited in his profession and freedom of movement, as well as hit by administrative sanction for violation of the obligation to vaccinate, explained his concerns about the administration of mRNA vaccines, asking whether it corresponds to good medical science to vaccinate the healed,” the lawyer said.
Morante added: “We wanted to understand whether informed consent, which he would be obliged to sign, is compatible with compulsory vaccination if there are excipients for non-human use or harmful to health, or enzymes already found in analyses recently published in a US scientific journal at the bottom of Dr. Ansovini’s report, which had already been drafted for this judgment.”
The Pesaro court accepted the appeal and ordered the technical assessment on the analysis of the content of the mRNA vaccines. The analysis of pharmaceutical contents, which will focus on proteins, will probably begin towards the end of September.
Another case in Italy
This is not only the first case brought to the court by Morante with the request to investigate the mRNA injections. In Rovereto, Italy, Dr. Paolo Lisi, a dentist working in the area, was also suspended from clinical activity because he did not want to get vaccinated against Covid, reports Euro Weekly News.
Dr. Lisi, who will be back in court at the end of September, has asked for damages from the health authority and the Medical Association regarding the suspension from his profession. The Doctor said, “In addition to the analysis of vaccine products, we are asking for tests on the blood of vaccinated patients compared to the tests on the blood of non-vaccinated patients.”
Judge Giuseppe Barbato reserved the right to produce a recent Swedish study on vaccines after agreeing to a request from the dentist’s lawyer.
It seems that lawyer Nicoletta Morante has figured out that one of the more effective ways to fight against Covid oppression is to sue those who mandate the vaccine and force legal discovery when they are hauled into court. That’s the only way the contents of the mRNA “vaccine” will ever be publicly revealed, and the adverse effects of the jab will ever be forensically identified.