The Truth about the Three-Fifths Compromise

While slaves were counted, it was their masters who enjoyed the representation.

Leftists and their pet useful idiots are lying when they say the Constitution claims black Americans only count as three-fifths of a person. During the time of the Constitution, the southern states wanted slaves to be counted for the purposes of representation and for that reason alone.

The argument to count slaves had nothing to do with empowering them but rather for gaining representation in Congress. The Constitution provides proportional representation, or apportionment, in the House of Representatives based on state population.

Today, left wing activists want illegal aliens to be counted in the census for the same reason.

The abolitionists and the northern states did not want slaves added at all. But the southern states wanted slaves to be counted fully. The northern states needed the southern states to form the union. In the end, the Three-Fifths Compromise was made.

The founding fathers agonized over slavery, which was deeply embedded in the economy for over a hundred years before they wrote the Constitution. After much debate, it was determined that slavery would be abolished, but incrementally.

The Three-Fifths Compromise hurt slaves, in that it essentially gave slave owners more power, not less.

It was a win-win for the southern states to count slaves so that they could gain the seats in Congress. While slaves were counted, it was their masters who enjoyed the representation. Since slaves could not vote, that representation empowered the slave holders, not the slaves, which is precisely why the southern states fought for it. The Three Fifths Compromise assured that there were more voices in the federal government to advocate for their cause.

Ask yourself: Why was it that the southern states were pushing for slaves to be counted for representation when it was the southern states who had slavery?

Renee Nal

Renee Nal is an investigative journalist and documentary film producer.


  • This is a simple answer to this question. The North had to acquiesce to create union of Northern and Southern colonies to defeat the British. However, by saying that slaves had 3/5’s representation it made slavery a Constitutional issue. The 3/5’s compromise was indicative of the USA’s efforts to get out of the depravity the British inflicted on the colonies.

    The South became more and more anti-capitalist leading to the Civil War. Cassius Marcellus Clay documented in the 1840’s and 1850’s this anti-capitalist sentiment, a higher crime rate in Southern States than in Northern States and the abrogation of the 1st amendment wherever the Slavocracy (re: Democrats) could get away with it to emasculate the opposition. (Sound Familiar?)
    I want to thank the one above who instilled the fighting spirit in those free black volunteers in who fought on the average of 4 years in Washington’s army and not the required 6-9 months.


Want to help?

Personal Info

Donation Total: $1.00

RAIR Rumble Channel

Canada's War on Christian Teenager Josh Alexander: Arrested for Speech, Suspended from School, Persecuted for Faith
Ground Breaking: Italian Court Orders Analysis of Covid 'Vaccines' to Determine if 'Harmful'
CRT Whistblower: Teachers Are Eliminated Who Refuse To Indoctrinate Your Children, Learn How to Fight Back

Our Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter to receive relevant updates throughout the week.

Do you live in the US

Send this to a friend