UPDATE: Please see RAIR Foundation USA’s story on the Facebook slander of this article.
French virologist and Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier created a scientific firestorm when he announced during an interview on CNEWS that the coronavirus virus (SARS-CoV-2) was manufactured and leaked from a Wuhan lab in China with HIV (AIDS) DNA.
Montagnier stressed that his job as a scientist is not to assign motive: “My job is to present the facts, I do not blame anyone, I don’t know who did this and why,” the scientist said.
Montagnier was the 2008 winner of the Nobel Prize in Medicine for the identification of the virus responsible for AIDS. Montagnier proclaimed he is one hundred percent certain molecular biologists designed the virus.
According to Montagnier, the coronavirus was said to have grown in the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory. “The Wuhan city laboratory has specialized in these coronaviruses since the early 2000s,” he claimed. “They have expertise in this area.”
According to Asia Times, as part of a 2004 cooperative agreement on the prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases, this coronavirus-creating Wuhan lab was designed and constructed with French assistance. However, the construction of the lab was not completed until the end of 2014.
The Wuhan lab was China’s first biosafety Level IV lab. However, in 2018, the US state department warned about a “serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to operate this high-containment laboratory safely.”
Other high-profile scientists have reached the same conclusions as Montagnier. An Indian lab confirmed in February 2020 that the coronavirus had at least four protein inserts from HIV that were bio-engineered. After facing backlash for their findings, the famous Indian research group was forced to retract their scientific findings. Montagnier explained, “I’m aged out. I’m a Nobel Prize winner, and I can work freely. So there’s no pressure on me to do anything.”
Watch the exclusively translated RAIR Foundation USA video below:
The establishment media has reacted swiftly and brutally to Montagnier’s discoveries. When the media responds in such a matter, the onus is on thinking citizens to push even harder for the truth. Where there is smoke, there is usually fire.
Transcript: many thanks to Miss Piggy for the translation.
Show host:
So what I’m interested in this morning is, that you’re working on the virus right now.
Nobel Price winning Doctor Luc Montagnier:
I’m working, but not necessarily in the lab.
Work is done on the computer with a colleague, and then that’s it.
We don’t do experiments, but we collect data from the disease itself, from all the measurements that are being done in the labs right now on the patients.
Show host:
—And you came to certain conclusions.
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
So, you could say that I came to the conclusion that there actually has been manipulation done on this virus.
Show host:
What do you mean? —Well, some of it, I’m not saying all of it, y’know. There’s a part which is obviously the classic virus and there’s another mainly coming from the bat, but that part has added sequences, particularly from HIV. The AIDS virus.
Host:
But when you say added, who added it?
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
I don’t know. —It’s not natural, is that what you mean? No, it’s not natural. It was a professional job.
It was a job for molecular biologists. It’s a very meticulous job.
You could say clockwork of sequences.
Host:
So, with what goal?
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
It’s not clear what the goal is. I’m not exposing it. If you like, my job is to expose the facts, that’s all. I’m not accusing anyone. I don’t know who did it or why.
There is a possibility that maybe they wanted to make —we don’t know who “they” are — but they wanted to make an AIDS vaccine.
So a small sequence of the virus is taken and put into the larger coronavirus sequence.
Host:
I’m not sure, I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying. You mean, in this virus, there’s a bit of HIV.
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
—That’s it. The genetic material of the virus is a long ribbon of RNA, correct? Like DNA, except it’s RNA and in this long ribbon at a certain place someone placed a small sequences of HIV and this small sequence isn’t small like insignificant; they have the possibility of modifying, for example, something called antigenic sites. So that means, if we want to make a vaccine, we can very well modify the protein for the vaccine by adding a small sequence from another virus.
Host:
—Are you certain? Because I think that was a rumor, that it had human origin after all and it was then refuted by most scientific authorities anyway.
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
There’s still a willingness to stifle it. If we’re working on it, and we’re weren’t the first. A very, very, very famous Indian research group had published the same thing and they were forced to retract it.
Host:
So how were they going to force them to retract it?
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
By cancellation, if you look at their obligations, you can see big block of cancellations because…
Host:
Then what you’re saying here is that most scientists are just saying otherwise anyway.
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
—More or less. More or less. Look, this happened at the beginning of the year and we’re seeing more and more evidence that suggests this.
You see, I’m aged out. I’m a Nobel Prize winner and I can work freely. So there’s no pressure on me to do anything.
Dr. Fauci said the next president would face a pandemic
Dr. Fauci specialized in HIV
Dr Fauci was associated with 37 million dollars given to the lab in China under the Obama administration.
Add this to the comments made in this video and it makes me wonder what these people werre doing. What will be the next surprise they have waiting for us.
Yes, Fauci did. His statement, made 3 times is on youtube. He made it on or about January 27, 2017 at a conference held at Georgeown Univerdity.
The greatest enemy of the people of any country is always the government of that country. Now we have global government. People should be wary of someone who says I am from the government and I am here to help you.
Bravissimo, Doctor Luc Montagnier.
The ChiComs did a good job, Wuhan SARS, I have read, attacks helper T cells, is this caused by the HIV segments? Are the HIV segments causing the several cases of persons becoming reinfected? If the Chi-Coms had managed to get Wuhan-SARS to be cronic then they might have had their dooms day weapon.
Could it be a doomsday weapon was their goal but got loose before they had increased Wuhan-SARS lethality and developed a vaccine to protect their population? These are questions we willnever get an answers to.
I agree completely…Chinese 4 Biolab has been working on it since 2000…maybe they started before….Chinese Military does not have a power to win in military conflict with USA…so this is another way how they can take power over the world…CCP with the help globalists….leftists and Democrats from USA have the plan how to take over the world…they will monitor our movements claiming they have to protect us from the virus which they made
Facebook blocked my posting of this article, stating it is FALSE…here is their own study from a third party…… Aaron T. Irving, Senior Research Fellow, Duke-NUS Medical School:
It’s easier to believe misinformation when it is mixed with truth. The region highlighted in the pre-print is indeed an insertion in nCoV-2019 relative to its bat ancestors and indeed it has high identity to the HIV gp120/gag. However, the authors chose to align only this small region and not do a basic check on whether there were other sequences which were also homologous (showing high degree of similarity/identity). As it turned out, the region is also homologous to many unrelated sequences. As such, the conclusions drawn from the data are no longer valid and there are many open-ended questions regarding this region highlighted. I see the authors themselves agree with this criticism by other scientists and have voluntarily withdrawn their preprint pending a much deeper investigation.
READ MORE
The author of this article by European Scientist also compared the genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 and HIV using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), developed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, and found “no significant similarity”, explaining that “In plain English, SARS-CoV-2 is not made of the bat coronavirus and small bits of the HIV virus.” Readers who wish to verify the level of sequence identity between the two viruses for themselves are welcome to follow the steps listed in the article.
REFERENCES
1 – Andersen et al. (2020) The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Medicine.
2 – Wan et al. (2020) Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. Journal of Virology.
3 – Wu et al. (2012) Mechanisms of Host Receptor Adaptation by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. Journal of Biological Chemistry.
4 – Wrapp et al. (2020) Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science.
5 – Xiao et al. (2020) HIV-1 Did Not Contribute to the 2019-nCoV Genome. Emerging Microbes and Infections.
FOLKS IF YOU HAVEN’T YET READ THIS BOOK IT EXPLAINS THE CONTAMINATION OF AMERICAN LABS UNDER FAUCI. THE BOOK IS
“PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION” BY DR. JUDY MIKOVITS IN APRIL 2020 HER BOOK CAME OUT WENT NO 1 BESTSELLER, SHE WAS DOING INTERVIEWS ALL OVER THE WORLD HER VIDEO DONE BY LONDONREEL I BELIEVE CALLED “PLANDEMIC” WENT VIRAL AND ALL THE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS CENSORED THESE VIDEOS AND INTERVIEWS, AS WELL AS THOUSANDS OF DOCTORS AND NURSES COMING OUT WITH THE TRUTH ON COVID. THOUSANDS OF DOCTORS AROUND THE WORLD ARE SPEAKING UP TO THE CRIMINALITY OF LOCKDOWNS, MASKS AND THE FALSE REPORTING AND TESTING OF COVID AND MFG. VIRSU. (THERE ARE 26 STRAINS OF COVID). FLU VACCINE – THE MOST IT HAS EVER BEEN SUCCESSFUL WAS AT 40%. VACCINES ARE PREPETUATING DISEASE THAT IS THE TRUTH. PHARMA KNOWS IT, FAUCU AND BIRX KNOWS IT THE CDC AND WHO KNOW IT AND THEY ARE INVESTED.THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IN 60 YEARS THAT DOCTORS ARE FIGHTING BACK TO GET THE TRUTH OUT AGAINST THE BIG PHARMA AGENCIES ( THAT ARE UNELECTED “OFFICIALS”). I.E. GATES FOUNDATION. CLINTON GLOBAL INTIATIVE. CDC, WHO. TIME TO DRAIN THE SWAMP
“While the analyses above suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may bind human ACE2 with high affinity, computational analyses predict that the interaction is not ideal 7.” This statement is used as proof that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not the result of lab manipulation is very weak. A computer model generated outputting of higher ACE2 affinity being “ideal”, compared to that of the actual SARS-CoV-2 ACE2 affinity does not preclude a non-lab origination.