In yet another glaring example of misplaced priorities, a Dutch court handed down lenient sentences to five migrant boys convicted in the brutal gang rape and assault of a 32-year-old homeless woman in Helmond. The horrific attack took place in a public park, where the vulnerable victim was ambushed, beaten, raped in rounds, and robbed of her belongings. Instead of delivering justice for the victim and ensuring public safety, the court prioritized “help” and “integration” for the migrant perpetrators, shielding them behind juvenile law and deliberately minimizing public scrutiny of their heinous crimes.
The Crime: A Chilling Attack in Helmond
The horrific crime occurred on December 16, 2023, in Helmond’s Burgemeester Geukerspark. The victim, a homeless and vulnerable 32-year-old woman, was sitting alone on a bench at night when the teenagers ambushed her. They surrounded her, locked her in, grabbed her under her arms, and dragged her to a grassy area where they carried out their depraved attack. She was beaten, her mouth covered to silence her screams, and raped multiple times in rounds by the attackers.
Adding to their depravity, the boys also robbed the woman of her cell phone before leaving her injured and abandoned. When police found her, she bore visible injuries, including facial bruises and swelling, and her pants were around her knees.
Prosecution and Verdict
The Public Prosecution Service (OM) prosecuted the five boys for gang rape, demanding only two years of juvenile detention, six to eight months of which would be conditional. Until the verdict was announced, the suspects remained in custody. However, the court’s sentences fell well short of these demands:
- Three suspects were sentenced to 15 months of juvenile detention, with three months suspended and a two-year probation period, for gang rape and theft of the victim’s phone.
- One suspect received 12 months of juvenile detention for gang rape.
- The fifth suspect, charged with assault rather than rape, was sentenced to four months of juvenile detention.
The perpetrators were also ordered to pay the victim just over €15,000 in compensation.
Secrecy and Leniency: Protecting the Criminals, Not the Victim
The entire case was shrouded in secrecy, with all court sessions held behind closed doors because the suspects were minors at the time of the crime. Media coverage was minimal, and police were reluctant to release details. This deliberate lack of transparency shields the attackers from public scrutiny while downplaying the severity of the crime.
The Court’s Disgraceful Priorities
The court’s decision to impose lenient sentences highlights its troubling priorities. Instead of ensuring justice for the victim and deterring future crimes, the judge focused on the perpetrators’ integration. Calling the boys “unaccompanied, minor foreigners,” the court insisted they “still need a lot of help and guidance” to function in Dutch society. As part of their sentence, they must complete an intensive guidance program through youth probation services, adding to the burden on Dutch taxpayers.
A Betrayal of Justice and Public Safety
This leniency is a slap in the face to the victim and to Dutch citizens. By prioritizing “help” for the rapists over justice for the victim, the court sends a dangerous message: violent criminals can exploit their status as “vulnerable migrants” to avoid meaningful punishment. Instead of integration programs, the response should have been swift and decisive:
- Deport the perpetrators and their families immediately.
- Strip them of any right to re-enter the Netherlands or any Western nation.
- Confront crimes like this as the societal poison they are, not as mere “learning opportunities” for sexual offenders.
This case represents more than a failure to protect one woman; it reflects a broader failure to prioritize the safety and dignity of citizens over the appeasement of violent criminals. The time has come for the Netherlands to abandon its misplaced leniency and enforce justice with the strength and clarity its people deserve.
IT’S SO WONDERFUL WITH THESE MUSLIMSHITS. URSULA “URINE” VON DER LEYEN, MACRON AND MARIN ARE SO IN LOVE WITH THESE MUSLIMSHITS.
Where were these migrants from? Are they representatives of a certain religion? Why is this information witheld?