Amy Mek
In a hard-hitting address to the Bundestag, Martin Hess, a prominent figure within the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, launched a scathing attack on Nancy Faeser, the Federal Minister of the Interior and Community of Germany, accusing her of presiding over a catastrophic decline in internal security. Hess, known for his staunch views on immigration and security, lambasted Faeser’s policies and performance, attributing the worsening security situation to the government’s “left-green-red narrow-mindedness.”
Hess began his speech by directly addressing Faeser, asserting, “The SPD is the gravedigger of internal security in Germany,” highlighting the Social Democratic Party’s (SPD) failure to safeguard the nation. He criticized Faeser’s handling of the police crime statistics, claiming they reveal a “colossal failure” in her duties to protect citizens.
Pointing to alarming figures from the crime statistics, Hess emphasized a significant rise in violent crimes, with the number reaching an unprecedented high of over 214,000 per year. He highlighted that a staggering 41.5% of suspects involved in these crimes were foreigners, representing nearly three times the proportion of the total population. Additionally, immigrants accounted for 13.5% of suspects, exceeding their share of the resident population by more than five times.
Hess underscored the disparity in crime increases among different demographic groups, revealing that while violent crimes among German suspects rose by a mere 2.2%, the rates surged by 14.4% among non-German suspects and a staggering 20.3% among immigrants, indicating a tenfold increase compared to German suspects. In the context of murder and manslaughter, the data showed a decline of 1.4% among German suspects, juxtaposed with an alarming 10.2% increase among foreign suspects and a 14.8% rise among immigrants.
These statistics, according to Hess, painted a grim picture of the erosion of internal security in Germany. He attributed the rise in violent crimes, including barbaric knife attacks, cruel sexual crimes, and brutal assault and robbery incidents, to what he termed the “borderless and irresponsible diversity and multicultural craze” of the Traffic Light government. Hess insisted that these trends necessitated an immediate correction of the government’s migration policy to ensure the safety and well-being of German citizens. He stressed that addressing these concerns was not xenophobic or racist but rather a necessary step to ensure the safety of German citizens.
Hess’s accusations of hypocrisy against Minister Faeser struck at the heart of the government’s credibility on immigration and security policy. He pointedly criticized Faeser’s recent statements advocating for the enforcement of rules against illegal immigrants, labeling them as long overdue and mere lip service to public concerns. Highlighting the discrepancy between rhetoric and action, Hess lambasted the government’s failure to follow through on its promises of large-scale deportations, which he argued were necessary to address the root causes of rising violent crime.
Moreover, Hess didn’t spare criticism for members of the CDU/CSU coalition, accusing them of complicity in the ‘importation of violent crime’ during their time in government. Drawing attention to the surge in violent crimes during previous administrations, Hess challenged the coalition’s credibility in advocating for stricter immigration policies. By juxtaposing the current government’s stance with past failures, Hess highlighted their pattern of neglect and ineffectiveness in addressing security challenges.
Hess urged Faeser and her colleagues to stop dismissing AfD’s concerns and to take decisive action to address the major security challenges facing Germany. He warned that every day Faeser remained in office represented a national security setback.
The AfD is Germany’s only conservative party. It is often defined by its staunch opposition to immigration, globalization, and encroachments on traditional German values. Formed in 2013, the AfD swiftly gained traction, particularly amid concerns over the European Union’s handling of the Eurozone crisis and the subsequent refugee influx in 2015.
However, despite its unwavering dedication to democratic principles and its legitimate concerns regarding illegal immigration, globalization, and the erosion of national sovereignty, the AfD finds itself besieged by unfounded accusations and relentless attacks orchestrated by the state and its affiliated institutions.
The AfD’s commitment to upholding German values and sovereignty has often been deliberately misconstrued as xenophobic or extremist by leftists seeking to silence dissenting voices. The party’s calls for stricter immigration controls and a reassertion of national identity are not rooted in their desire to protect Germany’s cultural heritage and ensure the safety and prosperity of its citizens.
OUT WITH ALL MUSLIMSHITS FROM EU, UK & USA!
IMMEDIATELY!
URSULA “URINE”VON DER LEYEN ARE SO IN LOVE WITH THESE CIRCUMCISED SYPHILITIC MUSLIMSHITS, URINE HAVING MANY OF THEM AS “LOVERS” AT HER HORSE FARM IN BURGDORF, HANNOVER. FREE FUCKS WITH URSULA, HER DAUGHTERS AND HORSES.
Perhaps a right to own and bear arms would be useful in turning those criminal aliens —into dead criminal aliens. Arm the citizens!
If someone were to walk up to a stove and touch a hot burner, then they would be burned. They hopefully would learn to not repeat the mistake.
The social engineering experiment (of importing heathen retards/criminals) has failed—miserably. Why would the political leaders keep touching a hot stove burner unless the purpose is nefarious! They are criminals that are blackmailed, bribed, or compromised. Most are sex perverts and imbeciles. Get rid of the problems, ie., heathen retards and the people/perverts that legislate open borders policies!
MARTIN HESS! MAKE SURE TO GET RID OF EU’s BIGGEST CRIMINALS FIRST, THEY ARE OF COURSE URSULA “URINE” VON DER LEYEN, SCHOLZ, MERKEL, SCHWAB AND HARARI!
I have read that a woman in the AfD party has been fined the equivalent of 6,000 simply for pointing out the fact that Afghan migrants in Germany commit a disproportionate number of sex crimes.
Why should she be fined or condemned or imprisoned simoky for saying that?? She’s not condemning every Aghani individual….she’s just pointing out a statistical fact, so that maybe yhe oroblem can be addressed.
A typical case of murderous islamic “head-kickers”:
Two suspects surrender after fatal attack in Paderborn
Almost a week after a fatal attack on a 30-year-old man outside a kiosk in Paderborn, two of the three suspects have turned themselves in. They are now in custody.
This was announced by the Paderborn public prosecutor’s office and the Bielefeld police. They are an 18-year-old Tunisian and a 16-year-old Moroccan who had been wanted, they said. An arrest warrant was issued against them for joint manslaughter. A third suspect is still being sought. The suspects are not giving his name.
Victim succumbed to his head injuries
The victim, a 30-year-old man, was critically injured on the night of May 1st, first by punches and later by kicks to the head. During an argument, an unknown perpetrator is said to have hit him on the head with an object, causing him to fall to the ground. The perpetrator and two other people then allegedly kicked the victim, who was lying on the ground.
Immediately after the crime, the police assumed that the 30-year-old would suffer permanent damage due to the loss of brain function. On Friday, the man finally died from his severe brain injuries. The investigation is still ongoing.
Road is considered unsafe
Friends and acquaintances of the deceased have laid candles and flowers at the scene of the crime in front of the Paderborn kiosk. Passers-by kept coming by on Saturday. Many are shocked.
“It was clear that this would happen here at some point,” says a man to the WDR reporter on site. Other passers-by say that the street is considered crowded and unsafe at night.
Crime possibly filmed
The investigators assume that the crime may have been filmed by bystanders. The police are therefore asking people who saw or filmed the crime or who can provide information on the identity or whereabouts of the suspects to contact a nearby police station or the homicide squad.
https://www1.wdr.de/nachrichten/angriff-fahndung-paderborn-100.amp
EU study: room for 3 billion more migrants, 66 million in Austria, 190 million in Germany
“Think big” is the motto of many globalists for whom the destruction of Europe’s fatherlands cannot happen fast enough. A paper published by the European Union in 2010 calculated how many more so-called “refugees” could be taken in. This was certainly not a spill. A table shows that, based on the current population density, there is still “room” for over 3 billion “people seeking protection”.
https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files_en?file=2020-09/final_report_relocation_of_refugees_en.pdf
This paper is a study by the European Commission under the direction of the “Directorate-General for Home Affairs”. The title: Feasibility study on a relocation mechanism for beneficiaries of international protection. The time at which this study was commissioned and completed is remarkable, as illegal mass migration began at the end of 2014.
In 2008, the annual number of asylum seekers was just 241,725 – for the entire European Union. This was to change dramatically a few years later. In 2008, a total of 65,495 people were entitled to international protection.
Even back then, the costs per migrant who would be provided with full care in an “arrival center” within the EU without any personal contribution were calculated. In the Netherlands, these costs amounted to almost 18,000 euros per capita per year, in Austria it was assumed to be just under 8,000 euros – and in Bulgaria the same service would probably have cost around 2,000 euros.
Table 12 then shows the supposed absorption capacity of the EU countries. The authors of the study saw no problem in importing many times the number of people currently living in these countries. Of course, these figures must also be understood as a means of manipulation. The decision-makers are persuaded that their countries still have room for millions of immigrants anyway, so they shouldn’t worry about a few 100,000.
https://report24.news/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image.png
Incidentally, the “big winners” according to this assessment would be France, Spain and Sweden, each of which would be home to well over 400 million people.
If this were not a perfidious population exchange plan, the paper and its proposals would have to be described as stupid. There is no need to go into details such as feeding and housing the new arrivals. In 2010, the world population was just under 7 billion people. According to this study, Europe should be able to accommodate more than half of this figure; the table assumes 3.8 billion people. Incidentally, it is also stupid to limit countries to their surface area and not take into account how much of this area is suitable living space. Spain, for example, has deserts, while Austria has massive mountain ranges.
It is important to note that Europe’s land area is very small compared to the other continents, with only Australia being slightly smaller. So why Europe in particular should absorb more than half of the world’s population is only known to the sick brains of the globalists.
Asia 44.6 million km²
Africa 30.4 million km²
North America 24.7 million km²
South America 17.8 million km²
Antarctica 14 million km²
Europe 10.2 million km²
Australia and Oceania 9.0 million km²
The paper makes it clear that the illegal mass migration, which is largely attributable to former German Chancellor Merkel, was planned and calculated in advance for a long time. This insane plan was carried out to the detriment of all those involved – including the people from foreign countries who were moved in this way as commodities.
A typical Pennsylvanian Dutch story: Polite wanted to shoot Germany, but Germany is alive and kicking thanks to divine providence. (Rohrkrepierer or just Ladehemmung?) It was the Spirit of Uunona, after all Hitler also survived all 11 assassination attempts unscathed. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler_Uunona
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/06/pennsylvania-pastor-attempted-shooting
“Ziss iss (nott) Fanny (ennimohr)”, says Herr Cleese. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13374615/John-Cleese-says-Britons-not-frightened-say-cultures-superior-wrong-Muslims-want-sharia-law-enforced-UK.html
Hitler is like Jesus in us. Jesus says we should embrace our enemies. Hitler says we should defeat our enemies. Both are true, but neither can be considered the ultimate method, only contextual. In my opinion, we have not only embraced our enemies, we have invited them to plunder us.
Now Mr. Hitler should be allowed to speak again and put an end to all this madness. Can you be Hitler and Jesus at the same time? Of course: all good deeds directed against our own kind are in principle Jesus. And all deeds that take the sword out of the hands of our enemies are, in principle, Adolf.
No-one has ever suffered from forestalling his murderer and finishing him off. Jesus should have his justification among our own, but first comes the unrelenting battle to assert and prove ourselves before Adolf and our own kind! Because any coward and weakling can give in, and even Jesus would be outraged.