Antisemitism Allegations Used to Silence Vaccine Opponent: MP Andrew Bridgen Expelled from Conservative Party (Video)

Andrew Bridgen, a British politician and businessman, has been expelled from the Conservative Party for quoting an Israeli doctor who said that the Covid vaccines “were the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.” He has been falsely accused of being antisemitic, something he denies, and has only ever been a friend and advocate of Jews. The expulsion of Bridgen is just the latest attack by the establishment to silence anyone against their vaccine agenda. In an interview with GBN News, Bridgen discussed the campaign being launched against him.

When asked if that was a flawed and potentially quite offensive comparison, Bridgen cites that 25 of the world’s leading Jewish doctors and scientists wrote a letter to Number 10 (Downing Street, the residence and office of the Prime Minister) on the 30th of December, accusing the prime minister of falsely accusing him of antisemitism, which diminishes real antisemitism. He also accused the prime minister of seeking to shut down his right to free speech in the House of Commons, which he regards as a sign of a totalitarian regime.

I’m grateful for the support of so many Jewish doctors and scientists who understand the pressing urgency of addressing ‘vaccine’ harms. https://t.co/aubeaInb0P

— Andrew Bridgen (@ABridgen) February 1, 2023

Bridgen is disappointed that his party leaked the news of his expulsion, as he believes that confidentiality was required for him to appeal against the unwarranted expulsion from the Conservative Party. He considers the accusation against him completely spurious and has issued a rebuttal document to the public.

Bridgen regrets being expelled from a party he has served for several decades and for which he campaigned hard. He barely recognizes the Conservative Party at the moment, as it seems to have moved away from being a party that legislates for the people to a party that legislates against the people. He believes he has the right to free speech to express his constituents’ genuine and legitimate concerns about the safety and efficacy of experimental vaccines, which were never tested properly.

He argues that considerable vaccine harm is starting to emerge now. Bridgen has given speeches in Parliament about the dangers of experimental vaccines and how they are being pushed on vulnerable populations.

Bridgen pointed out that he doesn’t see any evidence to support the claim that the vaccine’s benefits outweigh the risks for all age groups. Even the most vulnerable group, the over 70s, would require 800 people to be boosted to keep one person out of the hospital, whereas one in 800 is at least the average for a severe adverse reaction from the boosters themselves. He presented all the data in the House of Commons, and no one has been able to refute his figures because they are scientifically evidenced.

Bridgen also highlighted that those who say the vaccines are safe and effective are not on the science and medical side and have a financial interest. Eighty-six percent of the funding of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency is from big pharma, and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization had to declare over a billion pounds of personal interest in Big Pharma. So these regulators are compromised, and the people who are benefitting them are the ones who are funding them.

While some may disagree with his views, he should have the right to free speech and to express his constituents’ genuine and legitimate concerns about the safety and efficacy of experimental vaccines.

Bridgen has given speeches in Parliament about the dangers of experimental vaccines and how they are being pushed on vulnerable populations. He argues that considerable vaccine harm is starting to emerge now. Bridgen explains that he has been one of his country’s only Politicians speaking out, and if that’s cost him his political career, then so be it. If he has saved one child’s life from being injured, that’s worth it.

Bridgen’s expulsion is a sign of the Conservative Party’s departure from being a party that legislates for the people to a party that legislates against the people.