Baptism Lies: Whistleblower Vicar Exposes Church of England's Role in Migrants Faking Christianity to Enter the Country

In a shocking testimony before Members of Parliament, Reverend Matthew Firth, formerly of St. Cuthbert’s Church in Darlington, brought to light a concerning trend of asylum seekers exploiting the baptism system in the United Kingdom. Firth accused the senior leadership of the Church of England of deliberately overlooking this exploitation, suggesting political motives due to their support of mass migration behind their inaction, effectively aiding migrants in falsifying their religious beliefs to gain entry into the country.

During his testimony, Rev. Firth revealed that groups of approximately six to seven asylum seekers would approach him every two to three weeks, seeking baptism after their initial asylum applications had been rejected. This influx of applicants, predominantly comprising young Iranian and Syrian males, raised suspicion regarding the authenticity of their religious convictions. Firth further highlighted that the numbers significantly diminished when he introduced a stricter baptism process, requiring applicants to actively engage in church activities beforehand.

Criticism was directed towards the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, for his indifference to the widespread abuse of baptism by asylum seekers. Rev. Firth accused Welby and other senior Church figures of lacking transparency on the issue and being politically motivated, especially in light of their vocal stance on government migration policies. Despite the Archbishop’s absence from the Committee, Rev. Firth’s testimony underscored the urgent need for accountability within the Church’s leadership.

Responding to queries from Lee Anderson MP, Rev. Firth emphasized the necessity of injecting truth into the public discourse surrounding this matter, highlighting a lack of awareness and honesty among Church officials. He condemned what he described as a naïve and politically influenced approach within certain sections of the Church, contributing to the facilitation of fraudulent baptism requests by asylum seekers.

Bishop Guli Francis-Dehqani of Chelmsford disputed Rev. Firth’s claims, asserting insufficient evidence to suggest that Church of England baptisms were being exploited for asylum purposes. However, concerns raised by Rev. Firth and others regarding the authenticity of these baptism requests remain unresolved, indicating a division within the Church regarding its role in addressing this issue.

A Home Office minister, Tom Pursglove, reiterated the government’s stance, stating that there was no evidence of systemic abuse within the asylum process. He emphasized that Christian conversion alone did not dictate asylum decisions, attempting to assuage fears of preferential treatment based on religious affiliation.

While Lambeth Palace declined to comment directly on Rev. Firth’s testimony, they referred to Archbishop Welby’s previous remarks on the matter, expressing disappointment over the mischaracterization of the Church’s role in the asylum system. However, the urgency of addressing the exploitation of baptism by asylum seekers, as highlighted by Rev. Firth’s revelations, necessitates a concerted effort from both the Church and governmental authorities.