France: Open Borders Advocates' Hypocrisy Exposed When Their Children Are at Risk

A recent video report from France has brought attention to an encampment in Lyon’s park, initially claimed to be occupied by migrant “minors.” However, it has been revealed that the occupants are actually adult migrant men, raising concerns about their true status and age. This situation has sparked worries among residents, parents, and authorities, as the encampment continues to grow and pose a threat to the community.

The impact of the encampment on the community has been significant. The park, originally intended as a recreational space for children, has now become a temporary home for the migrant camp. This has caused unease among parents and residents, who witness their children navigating through the encampment while going to school or playing in the park. The cohabitation has raised valid concerns about safety and the disruption of normal activities, such as school sports classes and recreational games.

From a policy perspective, an investigation conducted by the Metropolitan Council of Lyon has confirmed that the individuals in the encampment are not minors. This absolves the council of any responsibility to provide care for them. In response to the situation, the council has opened 102 new housing accommodations, which are now occupied. These recent developments shed light on the challenges faced by local authorities in effectively managing migrant populations and providing the necessary resources to address the issue.

This encampment in Lyon mirrors a troubling scenario unfolding in Brooklyn, New York, where there is a growing controversy surrounding the potential housing of migrants on school grounds. The striking similarity between the two situations exposes a stark contradiction among those who have long advocated for open borders—an agenda they now seem to evade when it directly impacts their own children and families. In left-wing Brooklyn, a battle of hypocrisy is taking place as students and parents from P.S. 17 in Williamsburg stage a powerful protest against the proposed migrant housing on school premises. Their message is resoundingly clear: while they wholeheartedly support asylum seekers, they refuse to compromise their children’s education and safety.

This unexpected backlash illuminates an uncomfortable truth that those who champion open borders often conveniently avoid the consequences when their own communities and children are at stake. It raises profound questions about the authenticity of their principles and the true depth of their commitment to the causes they passionately endorse. In light of these revelations, it is imperative to reevaluate the underlying motives and genuine intentions behind such open border policies, prompting a critical examination of their true purpose.

\