Germany’s War on Conservative Speech: Media Authority Censors AfD’s Message on Open Border Dangers (Video)

In a fresh salvo against Germany’s only conservative political party, the Berlin-Brandenburg Media Authority (mabb) has issued harsh criticism of a campaign video released by AfD Brandenburg in September, labeling it “potentially detrimental to development.” The video has now led to legal allegations against the party. Released during the September state election campaign, it delves into critical issues facing Germany—crime, migration, and public safety—topics that have sparked both outrage and support among voters.

Critics argue that the media authority’s response is yet another tactic by Germany’s left-wing establishment to stifle political opposition. They suggest that, rather than addressing real concerns, officials are focused on censoring conservative voices to advance an agenda of open borders and ideological control.

The Content and Controversy

The AfD’s AI-generated video outlines scenes of crime, migration issues, and safety concerns while raising the question of Germany’s future security and prosperity. With powerful messaging, it asks viewers to consider the impacts of recent policies, painting a choice between continued social decay or a restoration of law, order, and cultural integrity.

The video received strong reactions online, with supporters celebrating it as an honest reflection of Germans’ struggles. Left-wing opponents, however, have condemned it as divisive and incendiary, accusing those voicing legitimate safety concerns of xenophobia.

(See the following video in question:)

Media Authority Accusations and Legal Scrutiny

In a letter obtained exclusively by FREILICH, the mabb argues that the video is likely to “impair the psychological and social development” of young people. They point to the video’s depictions of people “with dark skin and hair” in negative contexts, suggesting that it could foster stigmatization and discriminatory attitudes. Such censorship, however, ignores legitimate public concerns, according to AfD supporters, and reflects an ideological overreach rather than genuine youth protection.

The media authority also cited the lack of an AI-generated content label as a violation of the Youth Media Protection State Treaty (JMStV). They argue that, without proper labeling, young people may struggle to distinguish between real-life footage and AI-generated scenes, leading to potential “developmental impairments.” Additionally, mabb alleges that AfD Brandenburg, despite its limited resources as a grassroots conservative movement, violated youth protection regulations by not appointing a youth protection officer.

AfD Response: Fighting Against State Censorship

AfD Bundestag member René Springer dismissed the accusations as a politically motivated attempt to suppress legitimate campaign discourse. “This is an attempt by the state of Brandenburg to ban legitimate freedom of expression in an election campaign,” Springer said. “We will fight against this decision.”

The video itself has continued to amass views, reflecting the massive public interest in the concerns it raises. Supporters argue that the campaign materials shed light on overlooked issues like rising crime, a faltering transport system, and the overwhelming challenges posed by mass migration—issues they feel left-wing media refuses to address.

A Wider Pattern of Suppression?

For many, this incident represents a larger issue in Germany, where the state often seems more concerned with silencing dissent than addressing the failures of its immigration and social policies. Supporters of the AfD, who represent a growing conservative base, argue that instead of fixing these systemic problems, the government focuses on demonizing its critics, allowing Germany to drift further into social and economic turmoil.

The censorship of political discourse reflects a dangerous trend, one that continues to erode democratic principles and freedom of speech under the guise of “youth protection” and “social cohesion.” The struggle between open borders and border security, between traditional values and progressive policies, may define Germany’s future—yet that debate is stifled, critics claim, by a government more concerned with image than reality.

Continued Impact and Public Response

The video remains live on AfD Brandenburg’s social media channels, amassing over 150,000 views and sparking fierce debate. The question remains whether the German government will respect conservative voices or continue down a path of ideological enforcement and suppression.

As of now, the AfD’s message persists: they stand as a lone voice, fighting against an establishment that they believe is bent on silencing opposition and ignoring the people’s will.