Vlad Tepes
Across the Western World, a combination of leftists and Muslims are demanding Israel be destroyed. The pretense is Israel’s fighting back against Hamas—the Muslim Brotherhood entity (Islamic terrorist group) that attacked Israel on October 7th.
However, when it comes to the Left, the point is never the point, and the issue is never the issue. The revolution, however, is always the point and the issue.
Put another way, when it comes to the Left, their stated point or problem is often not the real issue but a concealed agenda; what you can be sure of is that the leftist revolution is always the objective.
Observing the various and numerous anti-Israel protests in Ottawa, it becomes increasingly clear that there are multiple agendas at work. Or, just as likely, another one altogether from the ones we have all seen on countless Twitter videos, where chants about the victim status of Gaza and the need to destroy Israel are chanted endlessly using military-like rhyme schemes and tattoos on snare and bass drums.
But the meta on this is much different.
Israel is the target of convenience—a nation-state very much in the Western tradition of individual rights and personal liberty. The accusation of Israel as an “apartheid state” or a “racist” state is purely the province of the Left and their initiate language or code for Western thought and bears no real resemblance to what the words mean to a person born to reason.
Put simply, when they say “racist,” they mean resisting the communist Revolution. When they say “apartheid,” they mean holding on to a Western concept of a nation-state that determines who can enter or not—in other words, resisting the Revolution.
In previous posts at RAIR Foundation USA, we isolated the communist flags at much more massive protests against Israel. We demonstrated why these seemingly incongruous groups are, in fact, in perfect alignment.
It’s time for a slightly deeper dive.
When groups that flag themselves as being of unorthodox sexual identities parade for a Muslim cause, like the destruction of Israel, the educated person is likely to smirk and imagine that those of non-heterosexual interests cannot know how they would be treated in an Islamic nation.
Phrases like “Gays for Palestine is like Chickens for KFC” memes pop up on Twitter as a response to the presence of these groups at Palestinian protests.
An example of groups who would be executed in an Islamic country protesting on behalf of Hamas is here below from November in Ottawa. Examine this complex signage below, with a Trans flag balanced against a ‘Palestinian’ flag (which has suspiciously similar symmetry) and an ANTIFA logo in the junction between the two flag poles.
A word about intersectionality
It is time to discuss the concept of intersectionality. While this term is commonly thrown around, its true meaning is typically understood only by those deeply involved in leftist ideologies. It’s akin to what Stephen Coughlin might call ‘initiate language,’ similar to the jargon insiders use in a secret group.
In simple terms, it refers to the point of intersection between disparate groups that share at least one common goal: the destruction of the West and Western nation-states. This includes, but is not limited to, Israel.
This means that those of the Left who join the Muslims in protesting Israel are fully aware of how Iran, Saudi Arabia, and other nations under varying degrees of Sharia law treat homosexuals. Let alone how they would treat the wide variety of additional sexual identities the Left has created precisely for this purpose, such as “trans” and others in the alphabet soup called LGBTQ++. But the point is never the point.
But the point is never the point.
The protests are not because an Islamic Palestine would be better for gay people.
The point is the destruction of all nation-states for now and forever to create one giant communist revolutionary world, and a good place to start, from their perspective, is Israel. And in no small part because they have the world’s Muslims as an ally, albeit for different reasons.
This is where the language of “occupation” and “colonialism” comes in.
These are also ‘initiate terms’, or coded language of the Left, meaning, in reality, those with a European mindset—those who believe in Western law. Concepts of ownership of property, family, the existence of nation-states, and human sexuality, as it’s always been understood, would be impediments to the Revolution and must be destroyed along with the nation-states they currently live in.
Israel is “occupied” land because it is a nation-state with the rule of law and a free market economy. What the Left would call “capitalist”. And occasionally, you see signs and hear chants that are honest about that interpretation by the various communists at the protests as well.
This weekend in Ottawa, a notable sign was spotted amidst the crowd. The sign displayed in the center of the crowd bore the message: “Palestine = unceded land.”
This sign represents what is known as ‘The Land Acknowledgment.’ It’s a strategic use of language aimed at challenging the fundamental right to govern or possess the lands of one’s birth. Essentially, it’s a tactic aligned with communist ideology, designed to instill the belief that we lack any legitimate claim to exercise ownership or enforce laws on these lands.
This perspective paves the way for leftist governments to justify mass immigration from diverse cultures. The underlying goal is to supplant our historical legacy, legal systems, traditional family structures, property rights, and even our freedom of thought and speech.
The sentiment behind the sign suggests that if we ourselves are not indigenous to this land, we then lack the authority to challenge the presence of others who also may not be indigenous.
This concept of land acknowledgment effectively denies our right to exist as we are. It has become a part of the narrative against Israel, where signs and chants describe Israel as “colonialist” and “racist.” These labels are intended to dispute Israel’s right to exist in any form. The interpretation of these claims can vary greatly depending on one’s perspective.
When interpreted using the rhetoric often employed by leftist ideologies, these terms – “racist” and “colonialist” – take on meanings that may differ from their traditional understanding. Within this framework, the accusations are seen as valid.
Conversely, when these claims are scrutinized using reason and a foundation in factual evidence, they appear to be baseless. This contrast highlights how the meaning and impact of these terms can change based on the lens through which they are viewed. This is not an accident. This was the intention.
One sign mentioned an “Anti-imperialist alliance,” which likely refers to the concept of intersectionality. This entails various groups, seemingly diverse in beliefs and norms, uniting to challenge Western Civilization in all its forms. This alliance represents a convergence of different groups, each finding common ground in their opposition to Western values.
Meanwhile, a short distance from the Elgin St. Peace Monument, where this protest occurred, a smaller demonstration against Trudeau and the rising tide of communism in Canada was underway. This gathering, a regular occurrence since the Freedom Convoy of 2022, included a man of Acadian descent holding a Donald Trump flag. RAIR Foundation USA approached him to inquire about his reasons for displaying it:
Amy Mek
RAIR Foundation
Great article. Another glimps into the deeper stratums of the ongoing political warfare.
One can gain very Rair perspectives and understanding at Vladtepesblog, that cannot be found anywhere else.
Rent-a-mob idiots are paid to chant and hold signs up. Most of these people are low I.Q., and have no idea what they are chanting about.
They just want to get paid so they can buy dope and fagoff on each other. Go look up trantifa mugshots. Most look unemployable, degenerate, and high on dope.
Way back in time we had the pothead hippies. They always had to have a cause d’jour. Then came the punk rockers, and they were all into hard dope and having a cause like the hippies. Both groups were anti-establishment. They would raise hell and march around too. I think every generation gets exponentially worse. This new batch are all fcktards. Useless idiots, and they will never amount to anything. I think they go to these protests, for the money being paid, and to hook up with other weirdos and screw each other thus speading their buttmonkeypox and VD.
I agree.
Fantastic article. You manage to distill Stephen Coughlin’s density into crystal clarity. Intersectionality is grossly misunderstood or ignored, but reading more articles such as this will help the rest of us understand how this part of the machine usurps our rights so very subtly while elevating the most fundamental goals of the collectivist revolution. Private property ownership and individual autonomy are in its crosshairs.