RAIR Foundation
In a time when truth and accountability seem scarce, amplifying the voices of those who dare to challenge the prevailing narratives is crucial. Denis Rancourt, a distinguished witness at the National Citizens Inquiry, has fearlessly stepped forward to shed light on the devastating consequences of government measures during the pandemic. His compelling testimony reveals a stark reality, urging us to question the official narratives and demand a deeper understanding of the complex geopolitical forces at play.
Unveiling the Deception
Rancourt’s testimony begins by dismantling the assumption that government interventions were necessary to combat the pandemic. Drawing upon extensive research and mortality data, he unequivocally states that the outcome would have been far better if governments had refrained from implementing mandates and restrictions. Contrary to popular belief, Rancourt reveals that the mortality signals did not align with the patterns expected of a viral respiratory disease pandemic. Exposing the contradictions, he highlights the absence of synchronized mortality peaks worldwide and demonstrates that the supposed pathogen was not exceptionally virulent. Rancourt’s meticulous analysis reveals the fallacy of the prevailing and official narrative of Covid19.
Assault on the People
Rancourt goes on to assert that the government’s measures were an assault on the people, leading to excess mortality. He points out that the peak of mortality immediately following the pandemic announcement was localized in specific hotspots where aggressive treatment protocols, rather than the disease itself, caused the tragic loss of life. Rancourt highlights the correlation between these hotspots and the imposition of aggressive measures, such as isolating vulnerable populations and disrupting social contracts. He emphasizes that these measures disproportionately affected marginalized communities, exacerbating poverty and leading to further loss of life. Rancourt’s testimony forces us to confront the devastating consequences of governmental actions.
Injections as Weapons
Perhaps one of the most shocking revelations in Rancourt’s testimony is his assertion that the injections themselves, that were forced on public as a solution, are being used as weapons. Drawing upon geopolitical analysis, Rancourt connects the dots between global power dynamics and the push for widespread vaccination. He explains that the military’s involvement in the organization and execution of the vaccination campaign enables them to quickly control and manipulate populations. Rancourt argues that these injections can be weaponized to subdue resistance or act as an antidote in the face of potential attacks. His bold claim challenges our perception of vaccinations as solely a public health measure, pushing us to examine the larger geopolitical context.
Understanding the Why
Rancourt’s testimony takes us beyond the immediate impacts of the pandemic, encouraging us to explore the underlying motivations and geopolitical realities. He argues that the current geopolitical landscape, characterized by the preparation for future wars, shapes the trajectory of global events. Rancourt highlights the significance of geopolitics in driving societal structures and the potential role of the pandemic as a tool within this framework. By shedding light on the geopolitical interests involved, Rancourt asks people to critically analyze our global context and question Canada’s support for military counter-measures such as mRNA platforms.
Denis Rancourt’s testimony at the National Citizens Inquiry unveils a truth that challenges prevailing narratives and demands our attention. It reveals the catastrophic impacts of government measures and exposes the geopolitical forces influencing our world and how they relate to one another. Rancourt’s courage in sharing his expertise forces us to reevaluate the conventional wisdom surrounding the pandemic.
Please watch the video below for the entire testimony.
Please refer to the earlier videos showcasing Dr. Rancourt’s groundbreaking revelations dating back to March 2021:
Amy Mek
It isn’t over yet. Spike protein shedders can infect purebloods. New plandemics are brewing. The bioweapon fake vax suicide shots have already killed 13 million globally, and more will die from the fallout. So for evil doers that is a success. WEF sodomite demons are gleefully rubbing their hands together. The latest WEF absurdity is people must eat their feces and drink their urine(dubbed biosolids) to fight global warming. Every week these (WEF) unelected turd punchers reveal another sick demented dystopian plan. The lapdog media perverts peddle their lies 24/7.
No bioweaponized pharma-sorcery shots were mandated for illegal aliens. Media morons never bring up that topic. Perhaps the satanic kabal needs a compliant workforce(replacement population)for dead body pickup and biosludging those dead bodies?
“In the aftermath of the war, several SS commanders who had planned and supervised the massacre were arrested and put on trial. Paul Blobel, the overall commander of the SS unit responsible for the massacre, was sentenced to death by the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials in the Einsatzgruppen Trial. He was hanged on 7 June 1951 at Landsberg Prison.[54] Otto Rasch was also indicted in the Einsatzgruppen Trial but his case was discontinued for health reasons, and he died in prison in 1948. Friedrich Jeckeln was convicted of war crimes by a Soviet military tribunal in the Riga Trial, sentenced to death, and hanged on 3 February 1946. Kurt Eberhard was arrested by US authorities but committed suicide while in custody in 1947.[55]
In January 1946, 15 former members of the German police (including Paul Scheer) were tried in Kyiv over their roles in the massacre and other atrocities. Twelve of them were sentenced to death (Fritz Beckenhof, Karl Burckhardt, Georg Heinisch, Wilhelm Hellerforth, Hans Isenmann, Emil Jogschat, Emil Knoll, Willi Meier, Paul von Scheer, Eckart Hans von Tschammer und Osten, Georg Truckenbrod, and Oskar Walliser). The other three received prison sentences. Those condemned to death were publicly hanged in the town square of Kyiv on 29 January 1946.[56] Erich Koch, who had been Reichskommissar of Ukraine at the time, was tried and sentenced to death by a Polish court for his atrocities in occupied Poland. However, he was never tried for his crimes in occupied Ukraine. His death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment, and he died in prison in 1986.”
WHEN WILL THE NUREMBERG TRIAL II BEGIN?
SO WE CAN SEE THE FOLLOWING NAMES INSTEAD OF THOSE IN THE LIST ABOVE, PLEASE SOON WRITE THE FOLLOWING NAMES IN THE SIMILAR NUREMBERG TRIAL II LIST:
HANGED: FAUCI, GHEBREYESUS, BILL&MELINDA GATES, SOROS, SCHWAB, HARARI, BIDEN, BANCEL, BOURLA SORIOT, VON DER LEYEN, MERKEL, SCHOLZ, MACRON, MARIN, NOHYNEK, ARDERN, TRUDEAU, etc, etc, etc.
WHEN?????????????
It is time. but what about their King Charles. He is also one of the criminals
It should be remembered that excess mortality in the so-called “hot spots” had more to do, i.e., in the case of UK where it’s provable, with a deliberate government policy to exterminate the elderly with Midazolam and Morphine, that were acquired in massive quantities for the job. Look for Michael O’Bernicia, who led the battle on that front in the corrupt English courts.
In other “hot spots” like New York City, and Quebec, the excess mortality was driven by removing ill elderly patients from hospitals and dumping them en masse into crowded “care” facilities, where sometimes the staff fled in terror and failed to show up for work. The elderly were found abandoned in their beds without food and without their underclothes being changed.
Addition deaths were undoubtedly caused by denying important surgical and medical treatments to the seriously ill in order to keep hospital beds empty, and avoid “contagious” contact with medical teams. But, of course, there was no deadly pathogen, there was no pandemic.
In other “hot spots” like Quebec, anyone over a certain age who was mis-diagnosed with the fake PCR test was deliberately “euthanized” (murdered) instead of being treated, as reported by the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition:
https://thereisnopandemic.net/2021/11/26/euthanasia-prevention-coalition-there-has-been-a-massacre-of-the-elderly-in-quebec-by-euthanasia-on-pretext-of-covid-19-19-november-2021/
It should also be recalled that hospitals, notably in the United States, were financially incentivized to mis-diagnose Covid-19 and then to isolate and intubate their victims to death while also administering deadly drugs like Remdesivir which causes kidney failure. Apparently, there was a brisk business in human organ harvesting in tandem with these “measures”.
A friend had Covid seriously. He was pushed into a small ward and left to die. A nurse found him and saved his life.
The people we trusted to save us and keep us healthy is part of this scam