Trans-Scam: Making Monsters Out of People for Communism

Communism, like Islam, represents a distinct system of thought that fundamentally differs from how Western nations approach all things.

Islam functions based on a set of imposed absolute truths, where all aspects of life must align with these truths. It operates in a top-down manner, and individuals who dare to question or present evidence against these truths are subject to punishment, often severe and sometimes fatal. On the other hand, our system begins with the assumption that we don’t know what’s true and engages in a process for determining what is true. We see this in our practice of law.

When determining the guilt or innocence of an accused individual, we start with no preconceived notion (the presumption of innocence) and rely on evidence to make a fair determination. This approach, known as reason or Western thought, operates from the bottom up, drawing conclusions about the truth based on reasoning rather than demanding that all reasoning supports preconceived conclusions of what must be true, as in Islam.

The purpose of top-down, conclusion-led reasoning is not to determine what is true but to protect the state and state ideology at the expense of the truth.

Communism shares similarities with Islam, particularly in terms of safeguarding the power of the state and the state’s ideology. However, to effectively combat communism, it is crucial to comprehend its operational principles.

If we were to choose a single term, it would be “Dialectics.” Properly understanding dialectics is an extensive endeavor. The absence of this understanding is why we struggle to grasp the intended meaning behind the communication of leaders who are clearly agents of socialism/communism. For example, we often perceive leftist leaders or spokespersons as hypocritical when they seem to hold different standards for themselves than the rest of society.

In reality, it is not hypocrisy within their system of thought but a tactical deployment of weaponized language aimed at progressively shifting the culture further to the left. As one clear example, it is now evident that anyone who advocates for true equality under the law is now labeled as a right-wing extremist and frequently associated with Ad-Hominems such as “White Supremacist” and other similar terms like misogynist, etc.

This demonstrates the extent to which the culture has already been shifted to the left by using that dialectic. The claim is that the normal is far-right wing while the extreme left is the only correct or normal way to think.

It is also essential to recognize that terms such as “white supremacist,” “misogynist,” or “anti-science” often serve as insider jargon or “initiate language,” as referred to by Stephen Coughlin, as a way of demonizing the middle class, which used to be more typically referred to as the “Bourgeoisie” in socialist/communist circles—the perpetual enemy of socialism/communism. Once you understand the “initiate language” of leftist leaders, much of what they say makes more sense.

In the following video, the topic revolves around a central aspect of the dialectic, which is often presented as “thesis, antithesis, synthesis.” This concept can be crudely summarized as pitting two opposing forces against each other to generate a new entity, a synthesis, which encompasses both everything and nothing, at least theoretically. However, in practice, it leads to immeasurable suffering, genocide, and a war against reality in all matters.

The writing of Karl Marx is mostly just a plagiarism of German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. And when one applies these core principles of Hegel and Marx to the issue of transsexualism, as does their intellectual descendants such as The Frankfurt School or The Fabian Society, the entire issue of transsexuality assumes a more comprehensible albeit monstrous purpose.

This purpose entails nothing less than the complete eradication of the fundamental concept of men and women, male and female, to destroy mankind and create ‘The New Man,’ the stated goal of communists since its inception.

The dialectic proposes merging man and woman to create a monstrous entity. Please note this terminology is not my own; it is the language employed by one of the actual architects of the transsexual dialectic as a weapon against Western Civilization, Susan Stryker.

“I am transsexual, and therefore I am a monster.”

For more on the nature of Hegelian/Marxist thought, typically referred to as communism or leftism, please see this recent interview with Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.