Amy Mek
A series of demonstrations against Quran burning in Sweden took place on Sunday, with gatherings in Stockholm and Malmö. These events have sparked a heated debate surrounding free speech, cultural integration, and the potential enactment of Sharia blasphemy laws in a Western country. As Muslims gathered at civic squares, holding up their Qura’ns and chanting the Islamic battle cry “Allahu akbar,” concerns have been raised about the underlying intentions of these demonstrations and their potential impact on democratic values and individual freedoms.
In response to the demonstrations, Minister of Justice Gunnar Strömmer (M) ignited a fierce debate by announcing that the government would consider the submission to Islamic law and potentially entertain changes to existing legislation to curtail Qur’an burnings in Sweden. This governmental action has triggered passionate responses from outraged Swedes who vehemently reject the notion of living under Islamic law. Meanwhile, Muslim organizations and influencers have celebrated the government’s willingness to reevaluate its laws and potentially submit to Sharia concepts of speech control, further intensifying the already polarized discourse surrounding this contentious issue.
The Islamic Cooperation Council, a controversial radical Islamic group, released an incendiary press statement denouncing Qur’an burning as a “hate crime” and an attack against Muslims. They urged their supporters to participate in a demonstration against such acts and all forms of hatred and threats. Additionally, Muslim social media figures used this opportunity to advocate for the implementation of blasphemy laws based on Sharia in Sweden. Through their online platforms, they argue that freedom of speech should not extend to activities that offend a significant number of people. They claim that the burning of the Qur’an violates the feelings of over a billion Muslims worldwide. These influencers also aim to manipulate public sentiment and exert pressure on the Swedish government to restrict free expression.
These orchestrated efforts to promote the enactment of Sharia blasphemy laws in a Western nation raise critical questions about the boundaries of free speech and the accommodation of cultural and religious practices. Detractors argue that individuals who find certain expressions offensive should consider living in countries that adhere to Islamic law rather than attempting to impose their beliefs on their new host countries. They emphasize the need to uphold national sovereignty and protect individual freedoms, including the right to express unpopular opinions.
Furthermore, proponents of free speech caution against enacting special legislation to protect one particular religion or group, as this could undermine the principles of equal rights and threaten the foundations of democratic societies. They highlight the potential consequences of granting preferential treatment to any specific religious group, suggesting that such a path may erode individual rights and a society built on equal rights. Critics contend that these demonstrations and the push for Sharia blasphemy laws are part of a broader agenda orchestrated by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), an influential bloc of 57 Muslim countries and the second-largest supranational organization in the world, right after the United Nations.”
The OIC seeks to pressure Western countries, including Sweden, into passing legislation that criminalizes any negative comments or criticism of Islam. By exploiting the controversy surrounding the burning of the Qur’an, these activists aim to dismantle the foundations of free expression in the West and replace them with repressive blasphemy laws aligned with Sharia principles.
The potential ramifications of enacting special legislation to protect Islam while suppressing the rights of other religious or non-religious groups raise significant concerns among proponents of free speech. Such preferential treatment for a specific religious group can undermine the fundamental principles of equal rights and pose a direct threat to the democratic fabric of societies. Critics argue that the inherent intolerance of Islam towards other religions and differing beliefs poses a substantial challenge to Western values, particularly those rooted in Judeo-Christian traditions.
They contend that these initiatives, often in collaboration with certain leftist leaders, go beyond protecting Islam and instead aim to suppress expressions that defend Western values, culture, and identity. Furthermore, these critics assert that both Islamic law (Sharia) and Marxist thought are fundamentally incompatible with Western culture and are being leveraged as tools to undermine the foundations of the Western world.
The ongoing debate surrounding the demonstrations against Qur’an burning in Sweden is emblematic of the larger clash between free speech, cultural integration, and the rising influence of Sharia law. It underscores the urgent need for open and honest dialogue about Islamic immigration and the policies related to open borders.
RAIR Foundation
Vlad Tepes
No wonder these inbred retarded heathens rape animals. Look at the top picture. They(females?)need the entire face burkha and a few cans of NAIR — monobrow cultures.—lolollolllollllolllll
I have family there too. How depressing to share the air and live near these hairy pigfaced cretins. That won’t help the suicide rates.
Ladies, remember that if you only have pepperspray, then use the spray on the rapefugee’s tallywhackers too. That way they won’t be able to get an erection with all the burning sensations. 💥
WooHoo, bring out the Swedish Flamethrower Team and The Swedish Bikini Girl’s Team. Make a BBQ party!
As you sow so shall you reap
the biggest ‘threat’ to society is NOT the religion of the Muslim, although it is a false belief. The biggest threat is JUDAISM. The great harlot has power and control over all the ‘kings of the earth’ {Rev. 17}.
This story diverts attention AWAY from the great harlot…I wonder why?!?!
It is those that call themselves jews, but do lie. Take Smellinski for example. He is KM Nazi sodomite trash. He is a talmudist type, not Torah. We have fake christians and fake catholics that are equally evil. They collaborate with each other too. However, God Almighty knows exactly what is each person’s heart, and will judge accordingly.
Now, don’t go insulting the Great Harlot, she was a shiksa.
WHY DID RAIR FORGET THE GENOCIDE CRIMINALS?
NOTHING IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THAT.
WHEN WILL THE “NUREMBERG TRIAL II” BEGIN?
ARREST AND HANG THE FOLLOWING GENOCIDE CRIMINALS FOR CRIMES AGAINST HIMANITY, BEGIN WITH:
FAUCI, GHEBREYESUS, BILL&MELINDA GATES, SCHWAB, HARARI, SOROS, VON DER LEYEN, MERKEL, MACRON, MARIN, NOHYNEK, ARDERN, ZELENSKY, TRUDEAU, BANCEL, BOURLA, SORIOT, then the rest, EVERY ONE OF THE GENOCIDE CRIMINALS DOWN TO EVERY CRIMINAL DOCTOR AND NURSE, MUST BE ARRESTED AND HANGED!
To hell with their goat smelling asses…!
Wow, that submission didn’t take long…
They knew this was coming. Just a matter of time. Either submit to the heathens or get ready for violent war. Think not? Then provide another scenario.
As the great Camus said, “Let it be war.”
“Kuwait to print 100,000 Qurans in Swedish ‘to affirm tolerance of Islam’ ”
BURN ALL THOSE QURANS IMMEDIATELY OR BETTER: SINK THE SHIP OR TAKE DOWN THE PLANE!
“World News
WATCH: Mob of Migrants Attack Graduation Party in Germany”
OUT WITH ALL MUSLIMSHITS FROM EU IMMEDIATELY!
NOW! IMMEDIATELY!
“Disney World in Orlando is suffering – here it is nearly mid-July, schools are out, families are on vacation, and the streets at Disney are just about empty!”
VERY GOOD! BRAVO!
LET ALL WOKE PRIDE ANHEUSER-BUSH / InBev SHIT GO BANKRUPT!
THE BIDET-SHIT BIDEN IS NOW IN EU AND ALMOST EVERY CLEVER EU CITIZEN ALMOST DIE LAUGHING WHEN SEEING THIS IDIOT “PRESIDENT” CLOWN!
What ever happened to Monty Python’s Life of Brian, released in 1979?
Some people just don’t have a sense of humour.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIu4AewZqc0
“More than 150 domestic and international flights use Mogadishu’s airport daily, according to the airport authority.”
THE QUESTION IS: WHY DO INTERNATIONAL FLIGHTS USE THIS MUSLIMSHITCOUNTRY’S AIRPORT?
Consider this :
Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam:
Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well..
Here’s how it works:
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.
It is a trick.
United States — Muslim 0..6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic
minorities and disaffected groups, often with major
recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is
happening in:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
For example, they will push for the introduction of halal food (clean by Islamic standards), thereby securing food preparation jobs for
Muslims.They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply.
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government
to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos)
under Sharia, the Islamic Law.
The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law
over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to
increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions.
In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non Muslim
action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons
and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections. FRANCE
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting,
jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues. Think what is going on in Turkey now, after the so called coupe attempt.
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks,
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels.
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent
jihad, some
State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these
nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim.
“The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, (28), (F) is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.’ This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States. Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Whether Islam is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.”
Can a Muslim be a good American?
Theologically – no, because his allegiance is to Allah.
Religiously – no, because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam (Qur’an 2:256).
Scripturally – no, because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Qur’an.
Geographically – no, because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially – no, because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.
Politically – no, because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders) who teach the annihilation of Israel and the destruction of America, the great Satan.
Domestically – no, because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat his wife when she disobeys him (Qur’an 4:34).
Intellectually – no, because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically – no, because Islam, Muhammad, and the Qur’an does not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist! Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
Spiritually – no, because when we declare ‘one nation under God,’ we are referring to the Christian’s God and not Allah.
They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and good Americans/Canadians; they cannot and will not integrate into the great melting pot of America.
The religious war is bigger than we know or understand. Muslims everywhere have said they will destroy us from within.
———-
People. Keep this for your records and spread it far and wide. Everyone needs to be aware of these facts