Amy Mek
The recent Islamic terrorist beheading of a teacher in France was inspired by a threatening video posted on social media and a conversation with the video’s creators. France and its open borders leaders failed to take seriously the threats made against the professor by Sharia-adherent Muslims. French law enforcement also ignored the reported warnings about the refugee suspect and his adherence to Sharia.
On October 16, 2020, Muslim refugee Abdoullakh Abouyezidevitch Anzonov shouted “Allahu Akbar” as he beheaded a 47-year-old history teacher in Paris, France. Shortly after the murder, police shot the terrorist dead. Law enforcement officials have taken fifteen suspects into custody in connection with the beheading of teacher Samuel Paty, who leaves behind a wife and 5 year-old child. Among the arrested is Abdelhakim Sefrioui, a radical imam known to intelligence services, and Brahim Chnina the father of a student at Paty’s school.
In early October, Professor Paty taught his annual course on freedom of expression which featured some of Charlie Hebdo cartoons of the Islamic prophet Mohammed. These same cartoons were the motivation behind the January 2015 Islamic terrorist attack killing 12 individuals at the the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo.
In the days following Professor Paty’s classroom debate, Brahim Chnina posted a video and post on social media falsely claiming that Professor Paty ordered all Muslim students to leave the classroom prior to the free speech lesson. He asserted that his daughter Zaina was suspended from the school when she refused to exit the classroom.
The principal of the school clarified that the cause of Zaina’s suspension from school was erroneous. Her suspension was not the result of anything that transpired in Professor Paty’s class, but rather the result of her recurring tardiness to school.
Brahim Chnina then went to the local police station with his daughter and filed a complaint against Samuel Paty for “dissemination of pornographic images” of Muhammad. He wanted the teacher to face charges for his blasphemous crimes against Muhammad. Chnina also wanted to make investigators believe that his daughter had participated in the course – which is false – and that her “psychological integrity” had been affected.
Did French police know that under Islamic law, those who insult Muhammad or Allah are to be executed? Did police investigate the father after he lodged his complaint and showed troubling signs of radicalization? They did, however, investigate the school teacher and sent an inspector to remind Professor Paty of “the rules of secularism and neutrality.”
When police investigated Professor Paty, they learned that the teacher did not make Muslim students leave the classroom nor identify themselves. Instead, the teacher gave all students the opportunity to excuse themselves from the classroom debate if they felt uncomfortable. Once law enforcement officials interrogated Professor Paty about the allegations, the teacher filed a defamation complaint against Brahim Chnina.
The defamation complaint, however, did not deter Brahim Chnina from his pursuit of “justice” against Professor Paty. Along with extremist Imam Sefrioui, Brahim and his daughter Zaina recorded themselves on October 13th in front of the school slandering Professor Paty and concocting another tale of an event that never took place. In the video, Zaina claims she was a student in the classroom the day the professor Paty showed the cartoon to the students. She explained that the teacher made her feel humiliated, disrespected and discriminated against as a Muslim. Zaina complained that she no longer wanted to attend the Islamophobic school.
Watch the exclusively translated of Brahim Chnina, his daughter Zaina and Imam Sefrioui, Brahim:
According to the latest evidence from the investigation, Zaina was not actually in the classroom when Professor Paty showed the cartoon to the students. In fact, Zaina never even had class with the victim and only pretended to be his student – Zaina was taught by another history teacher altogether.
In the video, Imam Sefrioui describes Samuel Paty as a “thug” and implores the public to not only denounce the teacher, but to expose his identity. Imam Sefrioui incites violence towards the teacher by stating that the blasphemous images of Muhammad shown in the classroom could lead to the eventual genocide of Muslims:
If we ever accept that [Muhammad cartoons], tomorrow we might get to what happened in Srebrenica, what happened in Yugoslavia.
Brahim Chnina and Imam Abdelhakim Sefrioui were on a mission to have the teacher punished. In the video, they discussed a complaint they lodged against the teacher with an “Academic Inspectorate”. The two men complained about the school principal minimized the serious nature the teacher’s “crimes” and was refusing to dismiss him. The men also mention filing a complaint against Paty with the controversial group, Committee against Islamophobia in France (CCIF).
Brahim Chnina continued spreading lies on Facebook, claiming Samuel Paty bragged “that he took part in a walk in support for Charlie Hebdo” to his daughter. Chnina urged those who love prophet Muhammad to threaten Samuel Paty: “You have his address and the teachers to demand he STOP”.
Brahim Chnina not only posted the video to his personal Facebook account, but he also revealed the name of Samuel Paty and shared the school’s location where he could be found:
The school subsequently received a fury of threatening phone calls. According to a student, Professor Paty was being harassed and threatened:
And the more the days went on, the more he was harassed by students and outside of college. He had a lot of death threats. A lot of people said they were going to kill him, etc. But we didn’t want to believe it. We said to ourselves that it was not possible that this could happen.
Fatwa against the beheaded teacher
In just under two weeks, the fatwa placed on Samuel Paty by Brahim Chnina and Imam Sefrioui was carried through by a Muslim refugee. Chnina along with Muslim religious leaders and followers led a harassment, defamation, incitement to hatred, and doxing campaign that led to Samuel Paty lying on the ground, beheaded, not far from the school where he taught with courage and honor.
Jihadi Anzonov, who is charged with beheading Paty, posted the video on Twitter by Chnina and the Imam calling for action to be taken against the professor. Anzonov also contacted Chnina and the Imam directly to “inquire” about Samual Paty.
Anzonov was reportedly seen at the school inquiring about the teacher. The terrorist gave several hundred euros to students in exchange for information to identify the professor. Four students from the school are in custody including, one 15-year-old students who was allegedly paid for information about professor Patty was taken into custody on Sunday.
Muslim organizations and many mosques also broadcast the calls of violence by Chnina and the Imam towards the professor. Below is just one example of a French mosque (Great Mosque of Pantin) that posted the Ibrahim’s video on its social media along with the name of the professor and the college where he practiced. A preacher from the mosque has been taken into custody as part of the investigation into the beheading of Samual Paty. The mosque has since removed their post which is captured below.
Father of the student and Imam both have terrorist ties
According to information from Marianne, Chnina and Sefrioui were taken into police custody this Saturday, October 17 as part of the investigation into the assassination of Samuel Paty.
The terror-tied Imam, Sefrioui is a member of the board of directors of imams in France, one of the main ring leaders calling for protest against the history teacher. Sefrioui has been well-known to French intelligence for over a decade for his associations with Islamic terrorist groups, Palestinian extremists, support of terrorism, violent intimidation campaigns and antisemitism.
During a press conference, the prosecutor of the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office, Jean-François Ricard, said that the half-sister of Brahim Chnina had joined the Islamic State organization in Syria, in October 2014.
Attentat de #ConflansSainteHonorine: La demi-soeur du parent d’élève à l’origine des appels contre l’enseignant avait rejoint l’#EI en #Syrie en octobre 2014 (Procureur de la République antiterroriste)
— Jean-Charles Brisard (@JcBrisard) October 17, 2020
Terrorist’s social media account
A few minutes after beheading his victim, Abdoullakh Anzorov claimed responsibility for his terrorist crime on his Twitter account which was opened in June 2020.
On Friday, October 16 the Twitter account, @Tchetchene_270 (since suspended) published a photo of Professor Paty’s head lying on the ground and a message stating: “In the name of Allah, the most merciful…to Marcon [French President Emmanuel Macron] the leader of the infidels, I executed one of your hellhounds who dared to belittle Muhammad, calm his fellow human beings before a harsh punishment is inflicted on you.” A few minutes later, the owner of the account gave the identity of his victim stating, “It’s Mr. Paty.“
The image below is the tweet which has now been erased by Twitter. This article’s author tried to release the image showing the terrorists claims on the day of the attack, but it was quickly flagged and erased by Twitter.
In the weeks leading up to the attack, the terrorist’s released hundreds of tweets on his Twitter. The terrorist mainly published extracts from the Qur’an. He also regularly shared personal comments on denouncing Macron’s bill against separatism and Iran’s condemnation of the republication of Charlie Hebdo cartoons.
On July 27, the terrorist’s account was report by the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism (Licra) because of his anti-Semitic comments.
Le 27 juillet la @_LICRA_ a signalé à @TwitterSupport un tweet à caractère antisémite publié par @tchetchene_270 , compte incriminé dans les faits terroristes d’hier. Ce tweet a été supprimé par Twitter dans les heures qui ont suivi. Nous transmettons ces éléments à la justice.
— Licra (@_LICRA_) October 17, 2020
On July 30, another Twitter account complained about the terrorist’s “racist and homophobic” comments made on Twitter:
It was reported in French news that the terrorist posted a photomontage featuring beheadings on his Twitter account on August 30.
Terrorist’s refugee background
Refugee Abdoullakh Abouyezidevitch Anzonov was an 18-year-old Russian Chechen muslim born in Moscow. In March 2020, when Anzonov turned 18, he was granted an automatic residence permit which allowed him to legally stay in France until 2030.
Anzonov’s family original asylum application to obtain political refugee status was denied by the state in 2008. However. However, for some unknown reason the decision was overturned by a Justice in the National Asylum Court in 2011. If the Justice had followed the original ruling, this family would have been forced to leave France and Samuel Paty would be alive today.
Below is the court decision which forced the State to grant refugee status to the family of the terrorist:
Professeur décapité à #Conflans (78) : la décision de Justice qui avait contraint l’État à octroyer le statut de réfugié à la famille de l’assaillant tchétchène, alors que l’administration le lui refusait pic.twitter.com/3L7kKbeF24
— Pierre Sautarel (@FrDesouche) October 17, 2020
Poland had previously denied Anzonov asylum. Poland has refused to listen to the demands of the left-wing European Union and flood its country with potentially dangerous and incompatible islamic refugees.
The Chechen refugee who decapitated a French history teacher in a Paris suburb on Friday after he showed a caricature of the prophet Muhammad to his pupils. was initially refused asylum by Poland. pic.twitter.com/GoZWK7N8kY
— Visegrad 24 🇨🇿🇭🇺🇵🇱🇸🇰 (@visegrad24) October 17, 2020
Terrorist’s radical background
Anzonov was a devout muslim who was previously known to authorities when he was a minor for “degradation of public property and violence in meetings”. Police listed Anzonov as a member of a gang in Éragny, a northwestern suburb of Paris. It is reported in French news that Anzonov spent time with a well-known radical jihadi in the gang.
Anzorov’s neighbors and friends describe him as “immersed in his religion [Islam]” for the past three years. Will the police be investigating the mosque he attended and any of the imam’s that he might have studied?
Among those arrested for aiding and abetting Anzorov are the terrorists grandfather, parents and 17-year-old brother. Chechnya where the terrorist and his family are from, is an area of Russia that is run by sharia, and has been the source of many jihadi terrorists over the years, including the 2013 Boston Bombing. Chechnya has tortured, imprisoned and murdered gays over the past several years. Under Sharia, homosexuality is punishable by death.
Did France make any effort to determine whether the Anzorov family is Sharia-adherent before welcoming them into France? Did France inquire into the family’s beliefs on freedom of expression, gays, Christians, Jews, etc.? Or were these very important questions ignored out of fears that the state would be accused of Islamophobia? Or were state officials scared that asking such questions about Islam might leave them headless in the streets of France like Samuel Paty?
Transcript: Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translation:
Zaina’s father, together with a member of the office of the Council of French Imams, on Thursday October 8 2020 went to the Bois d’Aulne high school in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine in the Paris region
[Father:]
Salaam aleikum. We are in front of the high school Bois d’Aulne in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, where a disgusting thing happened yet again. This week we witnessed, simply, the answer of a thug who is a teacher, to this call of the President of the Republic to hate Muslims, To combat Muslims, to stigmatize Muslims.
It’s been forty-five minutes that we’ve waited here in the cold, because the so called principal, she is in a meeting.
They didn’t even let us enter the lobby.
Anyway it’s been forty-five minutes. —Salaam aleikum, Zaina.
Salaam —Sorry to see you in those circumstances, but could you tell us exactly what happened?
[Zaina, Student in class, allegedly in the room with the teacher who was decapitated]
—We were in the history class about Islam and one teacher said to raise our hands if we were Muslims. At that point my girlfriend and I didn’t understand so we decided to raise our hands.
We raised our hands, and he said: I’m going to show a picture that might shock you, so, if you want, you can leave the room. So right away we said that we will do like everybody else, so like everybody else we want to see the picture you are going to show. Anyway, I refused to leave the room, and he showed the picture. It was the prophet Mohammed without his clothes.
Without his clothes on, and he showed it to us just like that. So in the class we were all shocked, even those who weren’t Muslim were all shocked.
So we were all shocked and [unintelligible].
[Father]
How did it affect you?
[Zaina]
—Well, he doesn’t have respect.
For them we aren’t equal to them, even though we are exactly like them.
Since I expressed that, he decided that I was disrupting his class, and he excluded me from classes for two days.
And I’m shocked that we were showed that, a completely naked man, during history class.
He doesn’t respect us. He doesn’t see us like the others, in fact. Why is he showing that precisely about OUR religion? In this way he wants to humiliate us in front of the others.
[Father]
Is that what you felt?
I found out that you didn’t feel like going to school
anymore after that.
[Zaina]
—No, I don’t feel like going to that class anymore, if it’s to see things like that. I no longer want to, with this teacher.
Ibrahim, Zaina’s daddy.
I’m not OK, like everybody else. Voilà,
I decided to make this video in order to tell you straight that my daughter was shocked as a result of the behavior of her teacher.
I don’t even like to use the word “teacher”; he is a thug.
A “history thug” who is supposed to teach them history and geography.
So this week he had the audacity to tell them to raise their hands if they were Muslim. They raised their hands and he told them: voilà, leave the class. My daughter refused to leave and she asked him why.
He said he was going to show a picture that would shock them.
Some students left, but my daughter didn’t.
Sure enough, he showed a completely naked man, telling them that this was the prophet.
He said that this was the Muslims’ prophet.
What was the message that he wanted to send to those children?
What hate! Why this hate? Why a history teacher is behaving like that?
In front of 13-year-old students?
This story is my story of the daughter, of my daughter.
My daughter is 13 years old, and it’s not only my daughter’s class
that this is about, but all four grades.
And in my opinion he has been behaving that way for years.
So all those who disagree with this behavior, or all those who had problems, or whose children were sent outside, because my daughter, since she refused leaving the room, the teacher made her leave the room by giving another reason.
If you want us to be together and that we say: “Stop!
don’t touch our children!” — send a message to me at 06 60 53 02 62.
This thug cannot stay in the national education system, he cannot continue educating children.
He has to go educate himself. Thank you for sharing as much as possible. I think this is about all of you. I’m speaking in the name of my daughter, but your children as well; the same thing is done to them in class.
[Spokesman for Bureau of French Imams]
We went with Ibrahim, with the father of little Zaina, and myself, in the name of the Council of French Imams, To the administration of the high school. So, as I already said in front of To the [administration of] the high school that it really was a lack of respect, already at the beginning, to make us wait for one hour in the cold and the wind.
Once we were allowed inside, we explained the seriousness of the case, but it didn’t seem to shock [the school administration] except for the [female] school principal, but very little. Apparently they knew already, and this had previously been done for about 5 or 6 years.
It’s been 5 or 6 years that children of 12 and 13 years, Muslims, have been shocked, have been attacked, have been humiliated in front of their fellow students, because that’s what they told us, those with whom we talked, and this doesn’t seem to be a problem whatsoever.
So we expressed our disagreement and our stupefaction, to find out that the administration could have known this and tolerated it. They even told us what it was on their internet page in the school program. So we let her know one thing, that we, the Council of French Imams and the Muslims, flatly refuse this type of irresponsible and aggressive behavior.
And that they don’t respect the rights of those children to keep their psychological integrity. So we said that we demanded the immediate suspension of that thug because he was not a teacher. A teacher is something else.
And this is a function that has a lot of nobility, greatness; by the way, it’s the case with the majority of teachers, who respect their work, who respect the goal of their work.
At the end of our conversation we understood that nothing was going to happen with this institution.
They let us know that. But she told us that she was going to follow through on the information. Indeed we left there with a strong resolve to mobilize for an action before this institution and before the Academic Inspectorate. But in the afternoon the Academic Inspectorate contacted the parent of the student and also expressed to him their surprise that this happened in the class of that thug, and that they were going to crack down, and that they were going to act in this direction, and that they were going to send inspectors to see that thug.
So , what am I telling you? I’m simply telling you that there we are in a straight line.
Indeed, we can see the development, this machine that is starting to work, and perhaps tomorrow, if we accept that [this type of treatment/behavior], tomorrow we might experience what happened in Srebrenica, what happened in .
Because those were people who lived very well, who lived together, who intermarried, and at the end they were… they arrived at… they didn’t know, just like today we don’t know. But when we hear a heinous discourse By the President of the Republic towards the Muslims, this lets us predict dark days. So, I’m asking everybody to stay vigilant.
We are expecting in the coming days the decision of the Academic Inspectorate, and that’s when we are going to react. And I’m asking all the parents, everywhere in France, to be very, very, very, very vigilant about what their children hear in the classes. So if there is a tiniest attempt at — because the problem is that the children, when… as in the current case: in the current case Zaina didn’t dare to talk to her parents on the first day. Because she was ashamed to talk.
She was really even feeling guilty for having seen it, so you see the extent to which they are inflicting on those 13-year-old children very, very, very, very damaging psychological violence. This is why we have to — absolutely, absolutely — stay very, very, very, very vigilant and mobilized, in order to be able to rapidly act against these violations of the rights of children, as well, because that’s what it’s about.
Days after the police became involved, the father released a second slanderous videos about the teacher Facebook account.
The two men also exposed the teacher’s identity and called for action against Professor Paty. This dangerous video was promoted on Twitter and was shared by the terrorist who beheaded the teacher.
Several weeks ago, history and geography teacher Samuel Paty, held a debate in his classroom on freedom of expression. During this debate he showed his students caricatures of Muhammad published by Charlie Hebdo. The annual event turned into a controversy on October 7, when Ibrahim, a father of a student at the school released one of two slanderous videos about the teacher and the event on his Facebook account.
Thanks for the updates on news that will not be reported in the corporate msm!
How can I subscribe to receive updates to your website?
Thanks!
I do believe the teacher went to far. When I was in college, a young man wrote a play about Jesus. One of the scenes had him lusting for a young woman waitress. As a Christian at the time, I was shocked and hurt, but killing him was out of the question as a humane person wouldn’t think like that. This is why I despise religion. Call it what it really is….brainwashing
Are you lacking in the logic department?
The teacher did not go too far, his murderer did.
Western world fought hard for the freedoms we have today, and you are busy appeasing those who want to take it all away. Sharia apologists are the lowest cretins.
Amen, Will.
The Barbarian Muslims who took part in this murder of an innocent man deserve life in prison!